Alice McConnell wrote:@ Cliff/Viorel: Thanks for giving me the last word. But I suppose yours serves well enough.
Whatever that means.
Alice McConnell wrote:One last 'jab':
Of course! I assure you, it was expected. The price for this apparent fame you seek is folks also being aware of your shining personality.
Alice McConnell wrote:...You keep saying I am fool for not letting it go. Who gives a fuck? You don't.
You want to shit on the site that was always based on a team effort while beating your chest with your red lettered "Admin" t-shirt. While I give two shits about glory, I won't stand idly by and watch other people get spat on just to you can feed your fucked up ego.
When it was you and I, it was a team. We collaborated well.
When it was Garian, you and I, it was kind of a team. You had already started beating your chest by then.
When it was you breaking the ONE rule I said was a hell no, it wasn't about a team effort, it was all about selfish little you.
I'll even share what I said back on .com. When you were asking to be added back to the admin team, WE honestly would have let you back in if it was only the deleted post thing (we even talked about it). We would have licked our wounds and carried on, but since you made such a bullshit dramafest over the whole thing, then lied about it, no. Garian was telling me "Just let it settle, just let it settle"
and I told him "Dude, are we not all held to the same standard?"
He said "I know, but still, just let it settle."
I said fine and bit my tongue. I told him that I was a bias party and wouldn't moderate you. He agreed, why? Because even though you got more leeway than anyone else there, we still wanted to maintain a high degree of fairness with all things considered. You got banned not because of reaching my tolerance (which was the forum rules), you were banned because you exceeded them to where HIS tolerance level was broke.
We caught a lot of flack for that because it was inconsistent with how everyone else who needed moderated was treated, for you.
So yeah, not at least recognizing the team who, even at your worst, still offered a great amount of consideration for YOU, is frankly an insult. But that's how you are, right? Take take take.
The irony of it is I originally wanted just the back-end work, but I quickly got pulled to the front-end, didn't I? I wonder why that is.
Why do I suggest you get over it? Because I'm clearly at a loss as to why you're still so pissy over something that happened many moons ago for one, but moreso your complete lack of simply "getting it" as to why things happened the way they did. Sit in denial until your senior years if that's what turns your gears, but when you bring this shit up my name gets pulled in...always.
So while you're being pro-active in flicking your forked tongue, I'm being reactive in calling you on your bullshit.
Lastly, Ceri, Garian and I worked as a team.
In fact, since this is no longer the same web presence as before, I invite either of them to offer anything
to the contrary on anything I've said.
Alice McConnell wrote:But have you noticed the other person, that came back to the forum just so he could post about this stuff? Check his name.
He posted about a past event specifically relating to this very topic! YOU are the one who went on a tangent bringing up other stuff. So don't point fingers at Garian when he simply plucked a petal and you came in watering the whole flower bed.