The thin red line for BTB RP

PLEASE READ THE RULES BEFORE POSTING!

How close should the RP be to the Books

RP should be exactly as the books, even the characters and names
0
No votes
RP should be exactly as the books, even the characters and names
0
No votes
RP should be Close to the books, with freedom of making one's character
23
37%
RP should be Close to the books, with freedom of making one's character
23
37%
RP should be at a distance from the books not to mix up their characters to the roleplayers'
3
5%
RP should be at a distance from the books not to mix up their characters to the roleplayers'
3
5%
RP should be further off from any written character or even the opposite
0
No votes
RP should be further off from any written character or even the opposite
0
No votes
RP should only use the theme and background of the books nothing more
5
8%
RP should only use the theme and background of the books nothing more
5
8%
 
Total votes: 62
User avatar
Sasi
Posts: 746
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:16 am
SL Name: Sasi

Re: The thin red line for BTB RP

Postby Sasi » Wed Aug 14, 2013 7:59 pm

Cassie wrote:Being BTB is rather questionable and limited by SL and the amoutn of people we play with.
Companion to a panther might not be realistic but we also don't have the necessary amount of citizens to play every role we require.


Playing in the respect of the culture, customs and mentalities as described in the books is always possible in SL. The difference is that SL allows us to give more depth to our characters, in the expression of their emotions.

Playing a snowflake character has nothing to do with the amount of players. Too, for adding to the realism of a background, the NPC is your friend.
User avatar
Cassie
Posts: 259
Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 1:09 am
SL Name: Isabeus

Re: The thin red line for BTB RP

Postby Cassie » Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:59 pm

Sasi wrote:
Playing a snowflake character has nothing to do with the amount of players. Too, for adding to the realism of a background, the NPC is your friend.


Geee, if I have to NPC my companion when I can get some human connection for a light bending seems really tight BTB. To each their preference but if I can connect well to someone who... is say an Outlaw I will at least try to talk into managing some compromise to make eachother's backgrounds work in a city complex.

I rather companion and outlaw than talk to a scribe wearing Lolas add-on on her dress, preferences... each of us in the end decides what is BTB.

The only appropriate way for me to belive my "believe" in BTB is correct is couting the number of people I get along with in BTB Gor rp and considering that number I think I'm pretty BTB. Strenght in numbers.
Godless heathens always waltz on the sky.
User avatar
Sasi
Posts: 746
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:16 am
SL Name: Sasi

Re: The thin red line for BTB RP

Postby Sasi » Thu Aug 15, 2013 2:09 am

I am sorry, but why a FW would companion an outlaw? It is a non sense, unrealistic....

A FW would never companion an outlaw, nor a man of lower caste and most often, anyway, she will companion a man of her caste.

If you have an OOC relationship with another player and want to companion his character, the simple solution is that one of you make some changes to the character's background.

And for an outlaw, it would be more plausible, if the woman loves him, that she submits to him...
Idunn Sabra
Posts: 103
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 6:12 am
SL Name: ...
Caste: of Frustrated
Role: Mentally Unhealthy
Home Stone: LOL

Re: The thin red line for BTB RP

Postby Idunn Sabra » Thu Aug 15, 2013 5:29 am

Sasi
If I recall well Marlenus proposed Verna (a panther girl - outlaw) to become an Ubara of Ar.

Of course she would stop be an outlaw once she accepts his offer, does not change a fact that even books allowed this what you call as unrealistic.

Cheers.
Image
User avatar
Mynerva
Posts: 661
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:22 am
SL Name: *****

Re: The thin red line for BTB RP

Postby Mynerva » Thu Aug 15, 2013 6:45 am

Idunn Sabra wrote:Sasi
If I recall well Marlenus proposed Verna (a panther girl - outlaw) to become an Ubara of Ar.

Of course she would stop be an outlaw once she accepts his offer, does not change a fact that even books allowed this what you call as unrealistic.

Cheers.



I do not believe this is a valid comparison. I agree with Sasi on this one. Being the Ubar - he could basically do whatever he wanted. Just some woman - who would most likely need the blessing of her male family members to do anything - and is heavily dependent on her standing in her city and society - completely different story - not even in the same universe.

Some woman FCing an outlaw - and then said outlaw most likely strutting around the city telling everyone who wants to know what a big bad outlaw he is.....no, not really...... :thumbdown:

I always wonder why people do not have more imagination. If she does happen to fall in love with an outlaw IC - why not work on making him respectable - or at least come up with an IC lie to make him FC material. ANYTHING.....besides just straight up throwing this shit in people's faces and not expect them to just shake their heads and walks away.

If the two players connect OOC and want to play companions IC - make a new character that is not an outlaw and knock yourself out!
Freiheit ist immer Freiheit der Andersdenkenden.
Rosa Luxemburg
User avatar
Mynerva
Posts: 661
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:22 am
SL Name: *****

Re: The thin red line for BTB RP

Postby Mynerva » Thu Aug 15, 2013 6:53 am

UmewakaKotori wrote:My personal opinion is that people should be able to use their own creativity to add things to the SL take on Gor. No world is static, and culture evolves.


What does that mean to your role play and role play in general?

I do have a problem with that whole "cultures evolve argument." I give you and example. If I really really enjoy role playing the high middle ages - I like everything about it, the culture, the dress, the way people talked, interacted with each other, the religious background - just all of it. Now I search for a place that advertised to be high middle age rp. I get there and I see people with clothing that would fit more into the Victorian time, the way people engage, the things they know, how they view the world....is reminiscent of the age of enlightenment. But I am looking for my favorite role play - the high middle ages! So in the end if all cultures we play evolve - then we will all have the same thing on every sim - no matter what the sim is described at. That is incredibly boring! When I want gorean role play - I want gorean role play - not some evolved version that is simply not gorean anymore.

If I want the high middle ages - I do not want Victorian, Enlightenment, or the 21st century.
Freiheit ist immer Freiheit der Andersdenkenden.
Rosa Luxemburg
User avatar
Anarch Allegiere
Posts: 1005
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:01 am
SL Name: Anarch Allegiere

Re: The thin red line for BTB RP

Postby Anarch Allegiere » Thu Aug 15, 2013 7:25 am

People can roleplay anything they want. It's not the snowflake characters that are 'by the books' or not, it's how the other people will react to them in roleplay that determines wether the scenes will be by the book or not.

The books themselves are full with 'snowflakes' and constantly characters being added in every next book that breaks the rules established in the previous ones ... else there'd been no stories to write.

When you IC enforce a culture it'll do more to add to the gorean theme than when you try to OOC enforce it.
User avatar
Glaucon
Posts: 2832
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:07 am

Re: The thin red line for BTB RP

Postby Glaucon » Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:58 am

I don't get the outlaw issue (well, I do, but bear with me): if the FW from a city were to companion an outlaw, with him staying an outlaw... they would not 'companion', formally. He is an outlaw, and thus, not within the city law. So, she would become an outlaw as well. And if he related to her as a free woman (and not a slave), she would effectively be free, so, effectively, a free woman (though with no effective legal status withing the city, making her the equal of any woman that isn't a free woman of a city and yet not acting like a slave, which, in my mind, would number many women on Gor).

And then you'd have a female outlaw! :shock: :o :fleeflee:

Which, of course, is perfectly by the books (assuming she didn't turn into a a GE femlaw, but continued playing as a normal gorean (free) woman, not a female commando with high heels, crossbows up her ass and biker gear and such), but which, naturally, isn't allowed in BtB Gor. :thumbup:
JackoS
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:59 am
SL Name: Jacko Stawberry

Re: The thin red line for BTB RP

Postby JackoS » Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:44 am

Hmmm don't want to sound too pesimistic, but in the first place, if we are in a btb environment can someone explain to me how can a FW (high or low caste doesn't matter, just a normal respectable FW) ever get to meet an outlaw, let alone meet him well enough to fall in love?

I mean, usually FW don't leave their cities, some are not allowed in the books to not even leave their quarters. And when they leave the cities they are heavily escorted and usually not allowed to talk to anybody.

It seems to me that such an occurrence would be very rare, if not nearly impossible in the books. Yes I know, maybe in book 47, Outlaw Love of Gor John Norman will show us an example, but I don't think most FW would ever even consider talking to an outlaw. And by the way, if someone says that the outlaw enters the city, well most outlaws enter the city just to end up in a stick... :mrgreen:
User avatar
Mynerva
Posts: 661
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:22 am
SL Name: *****

Re: The thin red line for BTB RP

Postby Mynerva » Thu Aug 15, 2013 3:38 pm

Glaucon wrote:I don't get the outlaw issue (well, I do, but bear with me): if the FW from a city were to companion an outlaw, with him staying an outlaw... they would not 'companion', formally. He is an outlaw, and thus, not within the city law. So, she would become an outlaw as well. And if he related to her as a free woman (and not a slave), she would effectively be free, so, effectively, a free woman (though with no effective legal status withing the city, making her the equal of any woman that isn't a free woman of a city and yet not acting like a slave, which, in my mind, would number many women on Gor).

And then you'd have a female outlaw! :shock: :o :fleeflee:


You are right - if it was played like that - I could go with that.

BUT - usually those kinds of things look more like that.

Beautiful female physician (merchant, scribe, take your pick) meets dangerous, brooding outlaw who hangs around her city. They start having tea together and lots of flirting is soon to follow. Then he courts her - while still being all dark and dangerous of course. Then the companion - often with a ceremony where half the sim is invited - she looks her usual beautiful self, and he is still dark and dangerous and wears lots of weapons.

The woman never even thinks about being ashamed - hell, she is in love! She never even thinks of leaving her city and living the outlaw life because she would be afraid of being thrown in jail or enslaved by the enraged locals - oh hell no - she is in love and everyone should accept her FC - because damned she loves him and wants to play out her love story!

The end :innocent:
Freiheit ist immer Freiheit der Andersdenkenden.
Rosa Luxemburg

Return to “Debate It.”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron