Kazim Nasr wrote:Mat Vhargon wrote:Kaitlin wrote:I'm not hiring a CEO. If I were then I would agree with you 100%.
The President is the CEO for the country.
I disagree with this statement completely. A president is not a CEO for the country. In fact, that is exactly what makes country's fail because it is such a narrow minded view of looking at the world. A country is not a company. A country is so much more. That is why some of our best presidents have never been businessmen. Because there is much more to running a country than crunching numbers and maximizing profit. Often, what a president has to do to take care of everyone of his country's citizens is exactly opposite what a CEO would need to do to maximize profit.
And back to the OP- Nothing will happen to him. He has enough money to prevent any real trial from taking place over this. People would rather try people over sex, anyways.
CEO is not just a business tittle it is literally the top executive position and I find it hard to argue otherwise. I have no idea where some get the idea that the role of the CEO is somehow limited in a company it is to manage the company and for the nation it is to manage the nation CEO is not relegated to the business world.
Either way the designation is rather meaningless it does not matter if you call him the CEO of the nation or the Commander in Chief or President (also a business title) we are all taking about the same person with the same job and that is to run the executive branch of the US