Drevan wrote:Keep your Atheistic Rhetoric bullshit out of this please. No one ever mentioned Gays not being allowed to be Parents thru adoption except you. Stay on topic
So that's the usual inane, pointless, cuss-laden non-comment from you out of the way. Did you have an actual counter to my point, or an argument to put forward, or a... well... anything of substance at all?
And please... in an argument that absolutely does have religious undertones (it's the whole basis behind the fact that this is even a debate in the first place) don't try to silence me because my beliefs may happen to differ from someone else's.
The comment was:
"And if the 'consider adoption' argument is being made by the religious..."
If it's not, or the reason for the comment is non-religious, then don't address it. Address the relevant bit. But don't get automatically pissy and throw a tantrum because someone dared to point out a blatantly hypocritical behaviour.
Since you are apparently incapable of separating out two different arguments, I'll make it easier for you:
"And 'consider adoption' might be more seriously considered when the approximate half-million children in care in the US already has decreased some."
Any counter point to this disagreement with your 'consider adoption' policy?